Chara makes a prominent appearance should the player take the Genocide route. ![]() They have played a major role in the events preceding the game, and are the true antagonist depending on which route the player takes. The end makes more sense for the Chara takes the protagonist's body, since at a genocide run the protagonist has a strong soulīut at the second time you run from Undyne, when you fall, it looks like a memory, of when Chara fell and Asriel found him, so it make more sense to my theory, as Frisk would only remember if he had been there, either from being Asriel(who is Flowey) or Chara. Chara is the player's character in the game, with their name changing as the player wishes. Death is the only ending for the villainess is literally what. ![]() Kinda like, he is a good person but when we do a genocide run, he gets traumatized with the need to kill, then we force him through a pacifist run, he waited the whole game to kill everyone. This thread is archived New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. Ive already read a couple like Under the Oak Tree, Doctor Elise and The Soulless Duchess. I have been thinking, the game breaks the 4th wall many times, most people say the first human takes the protagonist's body in the soulless pacifist run, but I have been thinking, what if, since we got to the end and we controlled the protagonist, the protagonist is just being himself? at the end of a genocide run there is something along the lines of "I noticed my determination wasn't mine, but yours", we are the ones making the protagonist progress, making him kill or spare, fight or have mercy, what if we are selling not the protagonist's soul to the first human, but instead our soul to the protagonist?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |